microscope: be useful tools for scientists

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, organism
Weight: 0.55
, technology
Weight: 0.53
Siblings telescope
Weight: 0.33
, spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.32
, scanner
Weight: 0.32
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.32
, optics
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful tools for scientists 1.00
be useful tools in biology 0.89
be important tool for biologists 0.88
be useful in science 0.84
is useful 0.82
be important tools understanding 0.82
be considered as important tool in biology 0.82
be useful 0.82
be considered as tool in biology 0.82
be considered as most important tool in biology 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(technology, be useful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(technology, be useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(technology, be useful)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(technology, be useful in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be useful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(optics, is useful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(scanner, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(technology, be useful)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(scanner, is useful)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(scanner, is useful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(optics, is useful)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(optics, is useful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(telescope, be useful)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(telescope, be useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(microscope, be useful tools in biology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(microscope, be important tool for biologists)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(microscope, be useful in science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools in biology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful tools in biology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be important tool for biologists)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(microscope, be useful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(microscope, be important tools understanding)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be considered as most important tool in biology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(microscope, be considered as most important tool in biology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful tools in biology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful in science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful in science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be important tools understanding)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(microscope, be useful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(microscope, be important tool for biologists)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful in science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(microscope, be important tools understanding)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(microscope, be important tools understanding)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(microscope, be important tool for biologists)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(microscope, be considered as most important tool in biology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(microscope, be considered as most important tool in biology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(technology, be useful in science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(technology, be useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(scanner, is useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(optics, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(telescope, be useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(technology, be useful in science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(microscope, be useful tools for scientists)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(technology, be useful)