microsoft: has state company

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents os
Weight: 0.69
, software company
Weight: 0.65
, giant
Weight: 0.63
, xml
Weight: 0.60
Siblings azure
Weight: 0.47
, solaris
Weight: 0.39
, freebsd
Weight: 0.38
, unix
Weight: 0.38
, linux
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state company 1.00
is good company 0.88
be good company work 0.85
be good company work for 0.84
has state office 0.78
has physical part corporation 0.78
is ethical company 0.77
has state jobs 0.77
was different from computer companies 0.76
be used in industry 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(software company, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(microsoft, has state company)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(software company, has state jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(software company, has state jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(software company, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(microsoft, has state company)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(microsoft, has state company)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(microsoft, has state office)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(microsoft, has state office)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has state office)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(microsoft, has physical part corporation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(microsoft, has state office)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(microsoft, is ethical company)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(microsoft, has physical part corporation)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(microsoft, is good company)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(microsoft, is ethical company)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(microsoft, has physical part corporation)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(microsoft, is good company)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(microsoft, is ethical company)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(microsoft, is good company)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, is good company)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, is ethical company)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has physical part corporation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has state company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(microsoft, has state company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(software company, has state jobs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(microsoft, has state company)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(software company, has state jobs)