microsoft: was made

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents os
Weight: 0.69
, software company
Weight: 0.65
, giant
Weight: 0.63
, xml
Weight: 0.60
Siblings azure
Weight: 0.47
, solaris
Weight: 0.39
, freebsd
Weight: 0.38
, unix
Weight: 0.38
, linux
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was made 1.00
is made 0.96
was staterd 0.86
be bad making 0.80
makes money 0.77
keep making 0.77
was found 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(software company, is made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(microsoft, was made)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(microsoft, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(software company, is made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(software company, is made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(software company, is made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(microsoft, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(microsoft, was made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(microsoft, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(microsoft, was made)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(microsoft, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was staterd)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(microsoft, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(microsoft, was staterd)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(microsoft, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(microsoft, was staterd)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(microsoft, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(microsoft, was staterd)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(microsoft, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was found)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(microsoft, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(microsoft, was found)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(microsoft, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(microsoft, was found)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(microsoft, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(microsoft, was found)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(microsoft, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(microsoft, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was made)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(microsoft, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(microsoft, was made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(software company, is made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(microsoft, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(software company, is made)