microsoft: was staterd

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents os
Weight: 0.69
, software company
Weight: 0.65
, giant
Weight: 0.63
, xml
Weight: 0.60
Siblings azure
Weight: 0.47
, solaris
Weight: 0.39
, freebsd
Weight: 0.38
, unix
Weight: 0.38
, linux
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was staterd 1.00
was made 0.86
is eous 0.83
is user-unfriendly 0.83
is open-source 0.83
is faggot 0.83
is zurich 0.83
was found 0.83
be is deffrent 0.82
was created 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(os, is eous)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(microsoft, was staterd)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(software company, is zurich)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(microsoft, was staterd)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(software company, is zurich)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(os, is eous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(software company, is zurich)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(os, is eous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(linux, is open-source)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(unix, be is deffrent)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(linux, was created)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(os, is eous)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(microsoft, was staterd)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(software company, is zurich)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(microsoft, was staterd)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(unix, be is deffrent)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(unix, be is deffrent)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(linux, is open-source)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(linux, is open-source)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(linux, was created)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(linux, was created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(microsoft, was staterd)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(microsoft, was made)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(microsoft, was found)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(microsoft, was created)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(microsoft, was made)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(microsoft, was found)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(microsoft, was created)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(microsoft, was made)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(microsoft, was found)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(microsoft, was created)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was made)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was found)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was staterd)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(microsoft, was staterd)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(os, is eous)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(software company, is zurich)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(unix, be is deffrent)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(linux, is open-source)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(linux, was created)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(os, is eous)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(microsoft, was staterd)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(software company, is zurich)