microwave oven: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents oven
Weight: 0.73
, household appliance
Weight: 0.72
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.72
, cooking
Weight: 0.72
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.71
Siblings toaster oven
Weight: 0.41
, microwave
Weight: 0.40
, frying pan
Weight: 0.39
, refrigerator
Weight: 0.38
, fridge
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality use 0.86
has quality change 0.86
be good for transmitinginformation 0.81
has quality evil 0.80
be bad for environment 0.80
be bad for us 0.80
be bad for food 0.80
go bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oven, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cooking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cooking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(microwave oven, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cooking, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(oven, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(cooking, has quality change)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(cooking, has quality change)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(oven, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cooking, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality use)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(microwave, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(fridge, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be bad for food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(refrigerator, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(microwave, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oven, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cooking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cooking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(microwave, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(microwave, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(microwave, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(microwave, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(fridge, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fridge, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(microwave, be bad for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(microwave, be bad for food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(refrigerator, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(refrigerator, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(microwave oven, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(microwave oven, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality use)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cooking, has quality change)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cooking, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(oven, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(microwave, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(microwave, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fridge, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(microwave, be bad for food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(refrigerator, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cooking, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(oven, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality use)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cooking, has quality change)