microwave oven: interfere with satellite t v

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents oven
Weight: 0.73
, household appliance
Weight: 0.72
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.72
, cooking
Weight: 0.72
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.71
Siblings toaster oven
Weight: 0.41
, microwave
Weight: 0.40
, frying pan
Weight: 0.39
, refrigerator
Weight: 0.38
, fridge
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
interfere with satellite t v 1.00
interfere with satellite t 0.92
interfere with tv 0.83
be used for satellite tv 0.79
interfere with wifi 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t v) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(microwave, interfere with tv)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t v) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(microwave, interfere with wifi)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t v) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(microwave, interfere with tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(microwave, interfere with tv)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t v) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(microwave, interfere with wifi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(microwave, interfere with wifi)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t v) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t v)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t v) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t v) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t v) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t v) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t v) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t v) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t v)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t v) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t v)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t v) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(microwave, interfere with tv)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, interfere with satellite t v) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(microwave, interfere with wifi)