microwave oven: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents oven
Weight: 0.73
, household appliance
Weight: 0.72
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.72
, cooking
Weight: 0.72
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.71
Siblings toaster oven
Weight: 0.41
, microwave
Weight: 0.40
, frying pan
Weight: 0.39
, refrigerator
Weight: 0.38
, fridge
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00
is supposedly dangerous 0.87
is cleaner dangerous 0.80
have dangerous waves 0.80
is harmful 0.79
be harmful 0.78
be considered unhealthy 0.76
is poisonous 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(oven, is cleaner dangerous)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(microwave oven, is dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(oven, is cleaner dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(oven, is cleaner dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, is poisonous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be harmful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(oven, is cleaner dangerous)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(microwave, is harmful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(microwave, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(microwave, be harmful)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(frying pan, is poisonous)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(frying pan, is poisonous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(microwave oven, is dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(microwave oven, is supposedly dangerous)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(microwave oven, is supposedly dangerous)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, is supposedly dangerous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, is supposedly dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(microwave oven, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(oven, is cleaner dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(frying pan, is poisonous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(microwave, is harmful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(microwave, be harmful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(microwave oven, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(oven, is cleaner dangerous)