microwave: be good for transmitinginformation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.66
, household appliance
Weight: 0.65
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, device
Weight: 0.64
, radio wave
Weight: 0.63
Siblings washer
Weight: 0.56
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.40
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.38
, frying pan
Weight: 0.36
, refrigerator
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for transmitinginformation 1.00
be bad for us 0.87
has quality good 0.85
be bad for environment 0.81
has quality bad 0.81
be bad for humans 0.76
make bread tough 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(technology, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(technology, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(technology, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(technology, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(technology, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(technology, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(technology, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(technology, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(refrigerator, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(technology, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(technology, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(refrigerator, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(refrigerator, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(microwave, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(microwave, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(microwave, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(microwave, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(microwave, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(microwave, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(microwave, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(microwave, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(technology, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(refrigerator, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(microwave oven, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(technology, be bad for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(microwave, be good for transmitinginformation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)