microwave: be more efficient than ovens

Related concepts

Parents	technology Weight: 0.66 , household appliance Weight: 0.65 , cooking utensil Weight: 0.65 , device Weight: 0.64 , radio wave Weight: 0.63
Siblings	washer Weight: 0.56 , microwave oven Weight: 0.40 , toaster oven Weight: 0.38 , frying pan Weight: 0.36 , refrigerator Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be more efficient than ovens	1.00
be kept inside microwave ovens	0.87
be better new microwaves	0.78
be better microwaves	0.78
be better then new microwaves	0.78
be better then microwaves	0.78
be used in microwaves	0.76
be new microwaves	0.76
be then new microwaves	0.76
be then microwaves	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(radio wave, be used in microwaves) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(microwave, be more efficient than ovens)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(microwave, be more efficient than ovens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(radio wave, be used in microwaves)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(microwave, be more efficient than ovens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(radio wave, be used in microwaves)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(radio wave, be used in microwaves) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(microwave, be more efficient than ovens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(microwave, be more efficient than ovens)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(microwave, be more efficient than ovens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(microwave, be more efficient than ovens)

Similarity expansion

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(microwave, be more efficient than ovens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(microwave, be better then new microwaves)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(microwave, be more efficient than ovens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(microwave, be better then new microwaves)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(microwave, be more efficient than ovens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(microwave, be better then new microwaves)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(microwave, be more efficient than ovens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(microwave, be better then new microwaves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(microwave, be more efficient than ovens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(microwave, be more efficient than ovens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(microwave, be more efficient than ovens)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(microwave, be more efficient than ovens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(microwave, be more efficient than ovens)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(microwave, be more efficient than ovens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(radio wave, be used in microwaves)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(microwave, be more efficient than ovens) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(radio wave, be used in microwaves)