microwave: is harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.66
, household appliance
Weight: 0.65
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, device
Weight: 0.64
, radio wave
Weight: 0.63
Siblings washer
Weight: 0.56
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.40
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.38
, frying pan
Weight: 0.36
, refrigerator
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is harmful 1.00
be harmful 0.99
be harmful to human body 0.87
is unhealthy 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(radio wave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(microwave, is harmful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(technology, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(microwave, is harmful)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(technology, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(microwave, is harmful)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(technology, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(microwave, is harmful)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(radio wave, be harmful to human body)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(microwave, is harmful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(technology, be harmful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(technology, be harmful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(technology, is harmful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(radio wave, is harmful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(radio wave, be harmful to human body)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(technology, be harmful)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(technology, be harmful)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(technology, is harmful)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(radio wave, is harmful)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(radio wave, be harmful to human body)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(radio wave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(microwave, is harmful)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(technology, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(microwave, is harmful)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(technology, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(microwave, is harmful)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(technology, be harmful)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(microwave, is harmful)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(radio wave, be harmful to human body)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(microwave, is harmful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(microwave, is harmful)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(microwave, be harmful)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(microwave, be harmful)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(microwave, be harmful)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(microwave, be harmful to human body)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(microwave, be harmful to human body)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(microwave, be harmful to human body)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be harmful)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(microwave, is unhealthy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(microwave, is unhealthy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(microwave, is unhealthy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be harmful to human body)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microwave, is unhealthy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(microwave, is harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(radio wave, be harmful to human body)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(technology, be harmful)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(technology, be harmful)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(technology, is harmful)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(radio wave, is harmful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(technology, be harmful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(technology, be harmful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(technology, is harmful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(radio wave, is harmful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(microwave, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(radio wave, be harmful to human body)