middle finger: is bad thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents index finger
Weight: 0.78
, ring finger
Weight: 0.71
, finger
Weight: 0.70
, gesture
Weight: 0.61
Siblings thumb
Weight: 0.37
, middle
Weight: 0.35
, pinky
Weight: 0.33
, pinkie
Weight: 0.31
, handshake
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad thing 1.00
is thing 0.94
is bad word 0.82
feel good 0.80
mean good luck 0.79
has quality bad 0.79
is good luck 0.77
snap something one 0.76
keep going 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(gesture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(middle finger, is bad thing)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(ring finger, keep going)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(middle finger, is bad thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(ring finger, keep going)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(gesture, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(gesture, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ring finger, keep going)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(handshake, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(middle, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(gesture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(middle finger, is bad thing)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(ring finger, keep going)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(middle finger, is bad thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(handshake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(handshake, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(middle, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(middle, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(middle finger, is bad thing)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(middle finger, is thing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(middle finger, is thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, is bad word)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(middle finger, is bad word)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(middle finger, is bad word)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(middle finger, is bad word)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(middle finger, is thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(middle finger, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(middle finger, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(middle finger, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, is thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, is bad thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(middle finger, is bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(ring finger, keep going)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(gesture, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(handshake, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(middle, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(ring finger, keep going)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(middle finger, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(gesture, has quality bad)