milkshake: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.63
, ice cream
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, beverage
Weight: 0.54
Siblings soda
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.35
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.35
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality price 0.80
has quality prices 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(milkshake, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(milkshake, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(soda, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(milkshake, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(milkshake, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(soda, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(soda, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(milkshake, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(milkshake, has quality price)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(milkshake, has quality prices)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(milkshake, has quality price)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(milkshake, has quality prices)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(milkshake, has quality price)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(milkshake, has quality prices)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality prices)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality price)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(milkshake, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ice cream, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soda, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(milkshake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ice cream, has quality good)