milkshake: has quality prices

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.63
, ice cream
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, beverage
Weight: 0.54
Siblings soda
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.35
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.35
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality prices 1.00
has quality price 0.93
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(milkshake, has quality prices)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(milkshake, has quality prices)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(soda, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(milkshake, has quality prices)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(milkshake, has quality prices)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(soda, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(soda, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(milkshake, has quality prices)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(milkshake, has quality price)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(milkshake, has quality price)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(milkshake, has quality price)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality price)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(milkshake, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(milkshake, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(milkshake, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality prices)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(milkshake, has quality prices)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ice cream, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soda, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(milkshake, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ice cream, has quality good)