mime: be faces white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents act
Weight: 0.57
, protocol
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.48
, clown
Weight: 0.46
, theme
Weight: 0.46
Siblings dance
Weight: 0.33
, dancing
Weight: 0.33
, singing
Weight: 0.33
, magician
Weight: 0.32
, puppet
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be faces white 1.00
have white faces 0.99
paint faces white 0.91
has physical part faces 0.87
wear white face paint 0.82
wear face paint 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(clown, have white faces)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mime, be faces white)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(clown, paint faces white)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mime, be faces white)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(clown, paint faces white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(clown, have white faces)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(clown, have white faces)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(clown, paint faces white)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(clown, have white faces)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(mime, be faces white)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(clown, paint faces white)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(mime, be faces white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(mime, be faces white)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(mime, paint faces white)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(mime, paint faces white)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mime, have white faces)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(mime, paint faces white)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(mime, has physical part faces)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mime, paint faces white)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mime, has physical part faces)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mime, wear face paint)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mime, have white faces)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(mime, wear face paint)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mime, have white faces)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(mime, have white faces)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(mime, wear face paint)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mime, wear white face paint)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mime, has physical part faces)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mime, wear white face paint)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mime, wear white face paint)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(mime, wear white face paint)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mime, wear face paint)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mime, has physical part faces)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mime, be faces white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mime, be faces white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(clown, paint faces white)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(clown, have white faces)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(clown, have white faces)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mime, be faces white)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(clown, paint faces white)