min: be under about

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.56
, minute
Weight: 0.55
, parameter
Weight: 0.53
, character
Weight: 0.51
Siblings interval
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.31
, free time
Weight: 0.31
, hour
Weight: 0.31
, max
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be under about 1.00
be under about phone 0.84
be under under phone calls 0.82
be under phone 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(min, be under about)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(min, be under about)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(min, be under about)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(min, be under under phone calls)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(min, be under about)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(min, be under about phone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(min, be under about)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(min, be under phone)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(min, be under about)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(min, be under under phone calls)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(min, be under about)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(min, be under phone)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(min, be under about)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(min, be under about phone)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(min, be under about)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(min, be under phone)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(min, be under about)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(min, be under phone)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(min, be under about)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(min, be under about phone)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(min, be under about)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(min, be under under phone calls)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(min, be under about)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(min, be under about phone)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(min, be under about)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(min, be under under phone calls)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(min, be under about)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(min, be under about)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(min, be under about)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(min, be under about)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(min, be under about)