mine: be at metal

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, project
Weight: 0.58
, land
Weight: 0.57
, weapon
Weight: 0.55
, operation
Weight: 0.53
Siblings miner
Weight: 0.34
, drill bit
Weight: 0.32
, dam
Weight: 0.32
, tunnel
Weight: 0.32
, landfill
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at metal 1.00
be used to get metal ore 0.83
has aluminum 0.81
be used to extract metal ore 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mine, be at metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has aluminum)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(mine, be at metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(landfill, has aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(landfill, has aluminum)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(mine, be at metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(mine, be at metal)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(mine, be at metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mine, be used to get metal ore)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(mine, be at metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mine, be used to extract metal ore)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mine, be at metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(mine, be used to get metal ore)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mine, be at metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(mine, be used to extract metal ore)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(mine, be at metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(mine, be used to extract metal ore)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mine, be at metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mine, be used to get metal ore)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(mine, be at metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(mine, be used to get metal ore)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mine, be at metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(mine, be used to extract metal ore)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mine, be at metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mine, be at metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mine, be at metal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(mine, be at metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mine, be at metal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mine, be at metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(landfill, has aluminum)