mine: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	thing Weight: 0.59 , project Weight: 0.58 , land Weight: 0.57 , weapon Weight: 0.55 , construction site Weight: 0.53
Siblings	miner Weight: 0.34 , drill bit Weight: 0.32 , dam Weight: 0.32 , tunnel Weight: 0.32 , landfill Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality good	0.96
be considered bad	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(weapon, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(mine, has quality bad)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(mine, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(weapon, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(mine, has quality bad)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(mine, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(project, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(project, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(project, has quality bad)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(project, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(dam, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(drill bit, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(landfill, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(dam, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(weapon, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(mine, has quality bad)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(mine, has quality bad)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(weapon, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(mine, has quality bad)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(mine, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(drill bit, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(drill bit, has quality bad)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(landfill, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(landfill, has quality bad)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(dam, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(dam, has quality bad)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(dam, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(dam, has quality good)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(landfill, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(landfill, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(mine, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(mine, has quality good)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(mine, has quality good)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(mine, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(mine, be considered bad)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(mine, be considered bad)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(mine, be considered bad)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality good)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(mine, be considered bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(mine, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(weapon, has quality bad)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(project, has quality good)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(landfill, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(dam, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(landfill, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(drill bit, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(dam, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(weapon, has quality bad)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(project, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(mine, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)