miner: be at underground

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, person
Weight: 0.54
, job
Weight: 0.53
Siblings mine
Weight: 0.34
, policeman
Weight: 0.32
, explorer
Weight: 0.32
, senator
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at underground 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(miner, be at underground)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(mine, be at underground)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(miner, be at underground)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(mine, be at underground)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mine, be at underground)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(miner, be at underground)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(miner, be at underground)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(miner, be at underground)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(miner, be at underground)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(miner, be at underground)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(miner, be at underground)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(miner, be at underground)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(miner, be at underground)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(mine, be at underground)