mineral: is natural resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.68
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, commodity
Weight: 0.64
, substance
Weight: 0.62
Siblings quartz
Weight: 0.73
, calcite
Weight: 0.73
, tungsten
Weight: 0.73
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.72
, iron oxide
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
is natural resource 1.00
is important natural resource 0.98
is natural resources 0.93
is important natural resources 0.93
is important resource 0.92
be natural resource of carolina 0.90
has quality resource 0.90
is valuable resource 0.88
be natural resource of south carolina 0.87
is nonrenewable resource 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(mineral, is natural resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mineral, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mineral, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mineral, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(mineral, is natural resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mineral, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(mineral, is natural resource)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mineral, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(mineral, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(mineral, has quality resource)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(mineral, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mineral, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(mineral, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(mineral, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mineral, is natural resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mineral, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(mineral, is natural resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mineral, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(mineral, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)