mining: affect positively and or negatively local populations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, sector
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, environment
Weight: 0.59
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings oil company
Weight: 0.34
, miner
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, banking industry
Weight: 0.32
, agriculture
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect positively and or negatively local populations 1.00
affect positively and negatively biosphere 0.90
negatively can affect soil 0.88
affect population 0.79
affect being 0.77
affect micmac culture 0.77
affect culture 0.77
affect environment 0.77
be affected by impact 0.77
affect human being 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(environment, affect micmac culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(environment, affect human being) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(environment, affect being) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(environment, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(environment, affect population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(environment, affect population)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(environment, affect culture)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(environment, affect being)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(environment, affect human being)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(environment, affect micmac culture)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect micmac culture)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect culture)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect being)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect human being)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect population)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, affect positively and negatively biosphere)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(environment, affect micmac culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(environment, affect being) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(environment, affect human being) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(environment, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(environment, affect population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(agriculture, affect positively and negatively biosphere) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(agriculture, affect positively and negatively biosphere)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(agriculture, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(agriculture, affect environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(mining, negatively can affect soil)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mining, negatively can affect soil)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mining, negatively can affect soil)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mining, affect environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mining, affect environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mining, affect environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(mining, negatively can affect soil)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(environment, affect population)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(environment, affect culture)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(environment, affect being)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(environment, affect human being)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(environment, affect micmac culture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(agriculture, affect environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(agriculture, affect positively and negatively biosphere)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(environment, affect population)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(environment, affect culture)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(environment, affect being)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(environment, affect human being)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mining, affect positively and or negatively local populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(environment, affect micmac culture)