mining: affect water pollution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, sector
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, environment
Weight: 0.59
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings oil company
Weight: 0.34
, miner
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, banking industry
Weight: 0.32
, agriculture
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect water pollution 1.00
affect air pollution 0.96
land water pollution 0.94
ground water pollution 0.93
has state pollution 0.92
contribute to soil pollution 0.90
get polluted 0.83
affect water cycle 0.80
use water 0.79
affected by chemical spills 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(environment, affected by chemical spills)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mining, affect water pollution)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(environment, affected by chemical spills)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(environment, affected by chemical spills)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, ground water pollution)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, affect water cycle)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, use water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(environment, affected by chemical spills)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mining, affect water pollution)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(agriculture, ground water pollution)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(agriculture, ground water pollution)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(agriculture, use water)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(agriculture, use water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(agriculture, affect water cycle)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(agriculture, affect water cycle)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(mining, affect water pollution)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mining, affect air pollution)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(mining, land water pollution)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(mining, land water pollution)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(mining, land water pollution)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mining, has state pollution)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect air pollution)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mining, land water pollution)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mining, affect air pollution)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(mining, has state pollution)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mining, has state pollution)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(mining, affect air pollution)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mining, has state pollution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect water pollution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mining, affect water pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(environment, affected by chemical spills)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(agriculture, use water)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(agriculture, ground water pollution)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(agriculture, affect water cycle)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(mining, affect water pollution)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(environment, affected by chemical spills)