mining: be dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, sector
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, environment
Weight: 0.59
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings oil company
Weight: 0.34
, miner
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, banking industry
Weight: 0.32
, agriculture
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous 1.00
is dangerous 0.99
was dangerous 0.96
be destructive 0.78
be in danger 0.78
be poisonous 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(environment, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mining, be dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(environment, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(miner, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(environment, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(mining, be dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(miner, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(miner, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(mining, be dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(mining, is dangerous)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mining, is dangerous)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(mining, was dangerous)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mining, was dangerous)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mining, is dangerous)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(mining, was dangerous)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mining, is dangerous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mining, was dangerous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(mining, be destructive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mining, be destructive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(mining, be poisonous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(mining, be destructive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mining, be poisonous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(mining, be poisonous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mining, be destructive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mining, be poisonous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mining, be dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mining, be dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(environment, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(miner, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(mining, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(environment, be in danger)