mining: be good coal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, sector
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, environment
Weight: 0.59
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings oil company
Weight: 0.34
, miner
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, banking industry
Weight: 0.32
, agriculture
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good coal 1.00
remove iron ore from mines 0.78
be cheaper than deep mining 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mining, be good coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(miner, remove iron ore from mines)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mining, be good coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(miner, remove iron ore from mines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(miner, remove iron ore from mines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mining, be good coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(mining, be good coal)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(mining, be good coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(mining, be good coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mining, be good coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mining, be good coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mining, be cheaper than deep mining)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(mining, be good coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mining, be good coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mining, be good coal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mining, be good coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mining, be good coal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mining, be good coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(miner, remove iron ore from mines)