mining: be in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, sector
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, environment
Weight: 0.59
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings oil company
Weight: 0.34
, miner
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, banking industry
Weight: 0.32
, agriculture
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in australia 1.00
be for australia 0.99
be in sydney australia 0.93
was introduced into australia 0.86
be major industiry in canada 0.83
be in india 0.82
be important to zealand 0.80
be important in india 0.80
become in india 0.78
be important to new zealand 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(environment, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mining, be in australia)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(environment, be in india)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mining, be in australia)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sector, become in india)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mining, be in australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(environment, be in australia)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(environment, be in india)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sector, become in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in australia)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in india)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sector, become in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be major industiry in canada)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be important in india)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be important to new zealand)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be important to zealand)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(environment, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mining, be in australia)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(environment, be in india)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mining, be in australia)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sector, become in india)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mining, be in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(agriculture, be major industiry in canada)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be major industiry in canada)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(agriculture, be important to zealand)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be important to zealand)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(agriculture, be important in india)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be important in india)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(agriculture, be important to new zealand)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be important to new zealand)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(mining, be in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mining, be for australia)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(mining, be for australia)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mining, be for australia)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mining, was introduced into australia)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(mining, was introduced into australia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(mining, was introduced into australia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mining, be for australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mining, was introduced into australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mining, be in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mining, be in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sector, become in india)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(environment, be in australia)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(environment, be in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(agriculture, be major industiry in canada)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(agriculture, be important to zealand)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(agriculture, be important in india)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(agriculture, be important to new zealand)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(environment, be in australia)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(environment, be in india)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(mining, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sector, become in india)