mining: contribute to soil pollution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, sector
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, environment
Weight: 0.59
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings oil company
Weight: 0.34
, miner
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, banking industry
Weight: 0.32
, agriculture
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
contribute to soil pollution 1.00
affect water pollution 0.90
affect air pollution 0.89
ground water pollution 0.88
land water pollution 0.87
has state pollution 0.87
use soil 0.84
get polluted 0.78
contribute ground 0.76
negatively can affect soil 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, ground water pollution)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(miner, use soil)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(agriculture, ground water pollution)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(agriculture, ground water pollution)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(miner, use soil)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(miner, use soil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(mining, contribute to soil pollution)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(mining, land water pollution)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mining, affect air pollution)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect water pollution)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mining, has state pollution)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(mining, land water pollution)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(mining, land water pollution)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect air pollution)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(mining, has state pollution)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mining, affect water pollution)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(mining, affect water pollution)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mining, affect air pollution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mining, land water pollution)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(mining, negatively can affect soil)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mining, affect water pollution)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(mining, affect air pollution)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mining, has state pollution)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mining, negatively can affect soil)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(mining, negatively can affect soil)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mining, negatively can affect soil)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mining, has state pollution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mining, contribute to soil pollution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(mining, contribute to soil pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(miner, use soil)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mining, contribute to soil pollution)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(agriculture, ground water pollution)