mining: harm habitats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, sector
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, environment
Weight: 0.59
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings oil company
Weight: 0.34
, miner
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, banking industry
Weight: 0.32
, agriculture
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
harm habitats 1.00
harm environment 0.87
be different from ecology 0.76
affect environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(environment, be different from ecology)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(mining, harm habitats)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(environment, be different from ecology)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(environment, be different from ecology)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(environment, be different from ecology)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mining, harm habitats)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(agriculture, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(agriculture, affect environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(mining, harm habitats)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mining, harm environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mining, harm environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mining, affect environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(mining, harm environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(mining, harm environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mining, affect environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mining, affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mining, harm habitats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(mining, harm habitats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(environment, be different from ecology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(agriculture, affect environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(mining, harm habitats)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(environment, be different from ecology)