mining: has physical part process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, sector
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, environment
Weight: 0.59
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings oil company
Weight: 0.34
, miner
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, banking industry
Weight: 0.32
, agriculture
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part process 1.00
has physical part zones 0.78
has physical part zone 0.78
was necessary for development 0.76
be sustainable process 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(enterprise, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mining, has physical part process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mining, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(enterprise, has physical part zone)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mining, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(enterprise, has physical part zone)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(enterprise, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mining, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mining, has physical part process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mining, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(mining, has physical part process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(mining, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mining, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mining, has physical part process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mining, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mining, has physical part process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mining, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(enterprise, has physical part zone)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mining, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(enterprise, has physical part zone)