mining: was introduced into australia

Related concepts

Parents	enterprise Weight: 0.61 , sector Weight: 0.61 , business activity Weight: 0.60 , environment Weight: 0.59 , occupation Weight: 0.58
Siblings	oil company Weight: 0.34 , miner Weight: 0.33 , automobile industry Weight: 0.33 , banking industry Weight: 0.32 , agriculture Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was introduced into australia	1.00
be for australia	0.86
be in australia	0.86
be in sydney australia	0.80
be important to new zealand	0.78
be important to zealand	0.77
be major industiry in canada	0.76
become in india	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(environment, be in australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(mining, was introduced into australia)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(sector, become in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(mining, was introduced into australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(environment, be in australia)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(sector, become in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(environment, be in australia)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(sector, become in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be major industiry in canada)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be important to new zealand)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be important to zealand)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(environment, be in australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(mining, was introduced into australia)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(sector, become in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(mining, was introduced into australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(agriculture, be major industiry in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(agriculture, be major industiry in canada)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(agriculture, be important to zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(agriculture, be important to zealand)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(agriculture, be important to new zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(agriculture, be important to new zealand)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(mining, was introduced into australia)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(mining, be in australia)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(mining, be for australia)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(mining, be in australia)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(mining, be for australia)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(mining, be in australia)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(mining, be in australia)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(mining, be for australia)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(mining, be for australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(mining, was introduced into australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(mining, was introduced into australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(sector, become in india)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(environment, be in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(agriculture, be major industiry in canada)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(agriculture, be important to zealand)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(agriculture, be important to new zealand)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(environment, be in australia)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(mining, was introduced into australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(sector, become in india)