ministry: has quality resources

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents minister
Weight: 0.75
, authority
Weight: 0.63
, body
Weight: 0.62
, organization
Weight: 0.62
, government
Weight: 0.62
Siblings prime minister
Weight: 0.69
, exodus
Weight: 0.55
, parliament
Weight: 0.34
, institute
Weight: 0.33
, federation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality resources 1.00
has quality good 0.79
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(government, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ministry, has quality resources)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(authority, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ministry, has quality resources)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(authority, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ministry, has quality resources)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(authority, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(government, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(authority, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(authority, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(authority, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(government, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(parliament, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(federation, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(federation, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(parliament, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(government, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ministry, has quality resources)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(authority, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ministry, has quality resources)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(authority, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ministry, has quality resources)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(parliament, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(parliament, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(federation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(federation, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(institute, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(federation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(federation, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(institute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(institute, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(parliament, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(parliament, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(ministry, has quality resources)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ministry, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(ministry, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ministry, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ministry, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ministry, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ministry, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ministry, has quality resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(authority, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(government, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(authority, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(parliament, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(federation, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(federation, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(parliament, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(institute, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(institute, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(authority, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(government, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ministry, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(authority, has quality bad)