minneapolis: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.56
, wisconsin
Weight: 0.55
, airport
Weight: 0.55
Siblings sacramento
Weight: 0.34
, milwaukee
Weight: 0.34
, new york city
Weight: 0.34
, michigan
Weight: 0.34
, lincoln
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00
is north dangerous 0.88
is dangerous dogs 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(city, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(city, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(city, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(milwaukee, is dangerous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sacramento, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(city, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(minneapolis, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(sacramento, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sacramento, is dangerous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(milwaukee, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(milwaukee, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(minneapolis, is dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(minneapolis, is north dangerous)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(minneapolis, is dangerous dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(minneapolis, is north dangerous)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is north dangerous)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is north dangerous)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is dangerous dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(minneapolis, is dangerous dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is dangerous dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(city, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(milwaukee, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sacramento, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(minneapolis, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(city, is dangerous)