mint: be analogous to flavor of fresh

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flavor
Weight: 0.66
, herb
Weight: 0.64
, plant
Weight: 0.61
, crop
Weight: 0.60
Siblings lemon balm
Weight: 0.62
, peppermint
Weight: 0.58
, caramel
Weight: 0.35
, raspberry
Weight: 0.35
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be analogous to flavor of fresh 1.00
be analogous to flavor 0.96
be distinct flavor 0.86
be considered flavor 0.83
is fresh taste 0.83
has state flavor 0.82
be flavor of freshness 0.81
be considered clean flavor 0.81
is default flavor 0.79
taste different 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(raspberry, taste different)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(raspberry, has state flavor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(raspberry, has state flavor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(raspberry, has state flavor)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(raspberry, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(raspberry, taste different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(mint, be flavor of freshness)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mint, be flavor of freshness)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(mint, be flavor of freshness)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(mint, taste different)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mint, taste different)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(mint, taste different)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mint, taste different)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mint, be flavor of freshness)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(raspberry, taste different)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mint, be analogous to flavor of fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(raspberry, has state flavor)