mirror: be better than lenses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lens
Weight: 0.65
, piece
Weight: 0.61
, image
Weight: 0.61
, surface
Weight: 0.60
, accessory
Weight: 0.60
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.35
, contact lens
Weight: 0.35
, picture frame
Weight: 0.34
, prism
Weight: 0.34
, magnifying glass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than lenses 1.00
be better than zoom lenses 0.94
be better than lenses for telescope 0.92
be better than lenses for telescopes 0.92
use convex lenses 0.88
form in lens 0.86
formed by lens 0.83
use convex lens 0.83
be formed by convex lens 0.82
formed by concave lens 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(image, form in lens)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mirror, be better than lenses)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(image, formed by concave lens)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mirror, be better than lenses)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(image, be formed by convex lens)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mirror, be better than lenses)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(image, form in lens)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(image, be formed by convex lens)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(image, formed by concave lens)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(image, formed by concave lens)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(image, be formed by convex lens)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(image, form in lens)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(magnifying glass, use convex lenses)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(magnifying glass, use convex lens)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(image, form in lens)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mirror, be better than lenses)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(image, be formed by convex lens)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mirror, be better than lenses)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(image, formed by concave lens)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mirror, be better than lenses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(magnifying glass, use convex lenses)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(magnifying glass, use convex lenses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(magnifying glass, use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(magnifying glass, use convex lens)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(mirror, be better than lenses)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses for telescopes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(mirror, be better than lenses for telescopes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses for telescope)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(mirror, be better than lenses for telescopes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(mirror, be better than lenses for telescope)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mirror, be better than lenses for telescopes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(mirror, be better than lenses for telescope)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mirror, be better than lenses for telescope)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mirror, be better than lenses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(image, form in lens)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(image, be formed by convex lens)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(image, formed by concave lens)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(magnifying glass, use convex lenses)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(magnifying glass, use convex lens)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(image, form in lens)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(image, be formed by convex lens)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(mirror, be better than lenses)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(image, formed by concave lens)