mirror: be opaque

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lens
Weight: 0.65
, piece
Weight: 0.61
, image
Weight: 0.61
, surface
Weight: 0.60
, accessory
Weight: 0.60
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.35
, contact lens
Weight: 0.35
, picture frame
Weight: 0.34
, prism
Weight: 0.34
, magnifying glass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be opaque 1.00
have transparent 0.79
is transparent 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(lens, is transparent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mirror, be opaque)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lens, have transparent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mirror, be opaque)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mirror, be opaque) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(lens, have transparent)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mirror, be opaque) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(lens, is transparent)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be opaque) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(lens, have transparent)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be opaque) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lens, is transparent)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(lens, is transparent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(mirror, be opaque) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mirror, be opaque)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lens, have transparent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(mirror, be opaque) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mirror, be opaque)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mirror, be opaque) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(mirror, be opaque)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(mirror, be opaque) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mirror, be opaque) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be opaque)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mirror, be opaque) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mirror, be opaque)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be opaque) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(lens, have transparent)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be opaque) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(lens, is transparent)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(mirror, be opaque) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(lens, have transparent)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(mirror, be opaque) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(lens, is transparent)