missionary: be on now evil internet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents religious leader
Weight: 0.57
, position
Weight: 0.56
, work
Weight: 0.54
, person
Weight: 0.53
Siblings priest
Weight: 0.64
, samuel de champlain
Weight: 0.39
, baptist
Weight: 0.33
, protestant
Weight: 0.33
, rabbi
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on now evil internet 1.00
be on evil internet 0.98
be on now internet 0.90
be on internet 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missionary, be on now evil internet)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(missionary, be on now evil internet)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(missionary, be on now evil internet)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(missionary, be on evil internet)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missionary, be on now evil internet)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(missionary, be on evil internet)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(missionary, be on now evil internet)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(missionary, be on evil internet)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(missionary, be on now evil internet)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(missionary, be on now internet)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missionary, be on now evil internet)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(missionary, be on internet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(missionary, be on now evil internet)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(missionary, be on internet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(missionary, be on now evil internet)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(missionary, be on evil internet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(missionary, be on now evil internet)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(missionary, be on internet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(missionary, be on now evil internet)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(missionary, be on internet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missionary, be on now evil internet)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(missionary, be on now internet)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(missionary, be on now evil internet)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(missionary, be on now internet)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(missionary, be on now evil internet)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(missionary, be on now internet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(missionary, be on now evil internet)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(missionary, be on now evil internet)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(missionary, be on now evil internet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missionary, be on now evil internet)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(missionary, be on now evil internet)