missouri: has color red

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents iowa
Weight: 0.62
, school
Weight: 0.61
, program
Weight: 0.60
, area
Weight: 0.58
Siblings kansas
Weight: 0.57
, tennessee
Weight: 0.36
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, kentucky
Weight: 0.35
, indiana
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has color red 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has color red)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has color red)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has color red)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has color red)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has color red)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, has color red)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has color red)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(kansas, has color red)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(missouri, has color red)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(kansas, has color red)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(kansas, has color red)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(missouri, has color red)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(tennessee, has color red)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has color red)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(missouri, has color red)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(indiana, has color red)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(indiana, has color red)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(missouri, has color red)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(kentucky, has color red)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(kentucky, has color red)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(missouri, has color red)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(missouri, has color red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(missouri, has color red)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(missouri, has color red)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has color red)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(missouri, has color red)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(missouri, has color red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has color red)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tennessee, has color red)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has color red)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(indiana, has color red)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has color red)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(kansas, has color red)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has color red)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(kentucky, has color red)