mistake: affect validity of contract

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents failure
Weight: 0.67
, error
Weight: 0.63
, part
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings fumble
Weight: 0.65
, fall
Weight: 0.60
, lesson
Weight: 0.59
, misunderstanding
Weight: 0.58
, enemy
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect validity of contract 1.00
affect validity 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(error, affect validity)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mistake, affect validity of contract)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mistake, affect validity of contract)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(error, affect validity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mistake, affect validity of contract)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(error, affect validity)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(error, affect validity)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(mistake, affect validity of contract)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mistake, affect validity of contract)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mistake, affect validity of contract)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(mistake, affect validity of contract)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(mistake, affect validity of contract)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mistake, affect validity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mistake, affect validity of contract)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(mistake, affect validity)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(mistake, affect validity of contract)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(mistake, affect validity)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(mistake, affect validity of contract)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mistake, affect validity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(mistake, affect validity of contract)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mistake, affect validity of contract)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mistake, affect validity of contract)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mistake, affect validity of contract)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mistake, affect validity of contract)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mistake, affect validity of contract)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(error, affect validity)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(mistake, affect validity of contract)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(error, affect validity)