mite: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parasite
Weight: 0.60
, disease
Weight: 0.58
, organism
Weight: 0.58
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.52
Siblings chigger
Weight: 0.47
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.35
, insect
Weight: 0.34
, fungus
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality worth 0.82
has quality questions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mite, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mite, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fungus, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mite, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(fungus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fungus, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mite, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mite, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(mite, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mite, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(mite, has quality questions)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(mite, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mite, has quality worth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(mite, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mite, has quality questions)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(mite, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mite, has quality questions)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mite, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(mite, has quality questions)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mite, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(mite, has quality worth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mite, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mite, has quality worth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(mite, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mite, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mite, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mite, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mite, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mite, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mite, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mite, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(fungus, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mite, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lyme disease, has quality bad)