mls: have refs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents league
Weight: 0.56
, website
Weight: 0.45
, system
Weight: 0.42
, sport
Weight: 0.41
, game
Weight: 0.40
Siblings ml
Weight: 0.32
, mlb
Weight: 0.31
, wikipedia
Weight: 0.30
, acc
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
have refs 1.00
have terrible refs 0.97
be to coaches 0.80
be to foreign coaches 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(mls, have refs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(mls, have refs)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(mls, have refs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(mls, have terrible refs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(mls, have refs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mls, be to coaches)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(mls, have refs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mls, be to foreign coaches)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mls, have refs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(mls, have terrible refs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mls, have refs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(mls, be to coaches)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(mls, have refs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(mls, have terrible refs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(mls, have refs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(mls, be to coaches)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mls, have refs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(mls, be to foreign coaches)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(mls, have refs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mls, have terrible refs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(mls, have refs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mls, be to foreign coaches)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(mls, have refs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mls, be to coaches)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(mls, have refs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mls, be to foreign coaches)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mls, have refs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mls, have refs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mls, have refs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(mls, have refs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mls, have refs)