mobile phone: be better than laptops

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cell phone
Weight: 0.86
, telephone system
Weight: 0.74
, digital camera
Weight: 0.73
Siblings smartphone
Weight: 0.70
, android
Weight: 0.63
, headset
Weight: 0.58
, pda
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than laptops 1.00
is computer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(smartphone, is computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(mobile phone, is computer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is computer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is computer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(smartphone, is computer)