mobile phone: be considered dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cell phone
Weight: 0.86
, telephone system
Weight: 0.74
, digital camera
Weight: 0.73
Siblings smartphone
Weight: 0.70
, android
Weight: 0.63
, headset
Weight: 0.58
, pda
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered dangerous 1.00
be dangerous 0.94
is dangerous 0.93
be dangerous to humans 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cell phone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cell phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be dangerous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cell phone, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be dangerous)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cell phone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cell phone, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(smartphone, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is dangerous)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mobile phone, be dangerous)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(mobile phone, is dangerous)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is dangerous)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is dangerous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cell phone, be dangerous)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cell phone, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(smartphone, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cell phone, be dangerous)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cell phone, is dangerous)