mobile phone: be expensive in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cell phone
Weight: 0.86
, telephone system
Weight: 0.74
, digital camera
Weight: 0.73
Siblings smartphone
Weight: 0.70
, android
Weight: 0.63
, headset
Weight: 0.58
, pda
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in canada 1.00
be expensive in australia 0.90
be in uk work 0.82
is expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cell phone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(digital camera, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(cell phone, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(headset, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cell phone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(smartphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(headset, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(headset, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be expensive in australia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be in uk work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in australia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(mobile phone, be expensive in australia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be in uk work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be expensive in australia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(mobile phone, be in uk work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(mobile phone, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be in uk work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(digital camera, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cell phone, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(headset, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(smartphone, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(digital camera, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(mobile phone, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cell phone, is expensive)