mobile phone: be very useful

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cellular phone
Weight: 0.87
, cell phone
Weight: 0.86
, digital camera
Weight: 0.73
, laptop
Weight: 0.63
Siblings personal computer
Weight: 0.72
, computer
Weight: 0.67
, internet
Weight: 0.67
, blackberry
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be very useful 1.00
be useful for do research 0.85
sort information very fast 0.80
has lot of usefull information 0.78
be suppose to make life easy 0.77
make us more productive 0.76
be hard to use than be necessary 0.76
be use as tool 0.75
be good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be very useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(internet, be useful for do research)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be very useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(internet, has lot of usefull information)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be very useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(computer, be hard to use than be necessary)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mobile phone, be very useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(internet, be useful for do research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(internet, be useful for do research)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mobile phone, be very useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(computer, be hard to use than be necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(computer, be hard to use than be necessary)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mobile phone, be very useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(internet, has lot of usefull information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(internet, has lot of usefull information)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mobile phone, be very useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(mobile phone, be very useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(mobile phone, be very useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be very useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be very useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mobile phone, be very useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be very useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be very useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(computer, be hard to use than be necessary)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be very useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(internet, has lot of usefull information)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be very useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(internet, be useful for do research)