mobile phone: is invention

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cell phone
Weight: 0.86
, telephone system
Weight: 0.74
, digital camera
Weight: 0.73
Siblings smartphone
Weight: 0.70
, android
Weight: 0.63
, headset
Weight: 0.58
, pda
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
is invention 1.00
is best invention 0.95
be helpful invention 0.90
is invented 0.86
were invented 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(mobile phone, is invention)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mobile phone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is best invention)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(mobile phone, is invention)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(mobile phone, is best invention)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(mobile phone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(mobile phone, be helpful invention)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mobile phone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be helpful invention)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(mobile phone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(mobile phone, were invented)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mobile phone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, were invented)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is best invention)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be helpful invention)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, were invented)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(mobile phone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is best invention)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(mobile phone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be helpful invention)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(mobile phone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(mobile phone, were invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(mobile phone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is invention)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, is invention)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is invention)