mobile phone: is useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cell phone
Weight: 0.86
, telephone system
Weight: 0.74
, digital camera
Weight: 0.73
Siblings smartphone
Weight: 0.70
, android
Weight: 0.63
, headset
Weight: 0.58
, pda
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useful 1.00
be useful for children 0.84
be useful in schools 0.81
be helpful invention 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(cell phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cell phone, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(cell phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(smartphone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(mobile phone, is useful)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be useful for children)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(mobile phone, be useful for children)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be useful in schools)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(mobile phone, be useful in schools)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(mobile phone, be helpful invention)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be helpful invention)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be useful for children)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be useful in schools)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be helpful invention)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be useful for children)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be useful in schools)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be helpful invention)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cell phone, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(smartphone, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mobile phone, is useful)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cell phone, is useful)