mobile: be considered kinetic art

Related concepts

Parents	electronic device Weight: 0.70 , technology Weight: 0.66 , medium Weight: 0.65 , market Weight: 0.61
Siblings	cellphone Weight: 0.37 , tablet computer Weight: 0.36 , cellular telephone Weight: 0.36 , phone Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered kinetic art	1.00
be considered art	0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(mobile, be considered kinetic art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(mobile, be considered kinetic art)

Similarity expansion

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(mobile, be considered kinetic art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(mobile, be considered art)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(mobile, be considered kinetic art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(mobile, be considered art)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(mobile, be considered kinetic art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(mobile, be considered art)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(mobile, be considered kinetic art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(mobile, be considered art)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(mobile, be considered kinetic art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(mobile, be considered kinetic art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(mobile, be considered kinetic art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(mobile, be considered kinetic art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(mobile, be considered kinetic art)