mobile: be expensive in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.70
, technology
Weight: 0.66
, medium
Weight: 0.65
, market
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cellphone
Weight: 0.37
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36
, cellular telephone
Weight: 0.36
, phone
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in canada 1.00
is expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(medium, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mobile, be expensive in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(medium, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(medium, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(phone, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(medium, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(mobile, be expensive in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(phone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(phone, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(cellphone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cellphone, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(mobile, be expensive in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(mobile, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mobile, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mobile, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mobile, be expensive in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mobile, be expensive in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(medium, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cellphone, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(phone, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(mobile, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(medium, is expensive)