mobile: be used

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.70
, technology
Weight: 0.66
, medium
Weight: 0.65
, market
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cellphone
Weight: 0.37
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36
, cellular telephone
Weight: 0.36
, phone
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used 1.00
be used in business 0.80
want use 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(technology, be used)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mobile, be used)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mobile, be used)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(technology, be used)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(mobile, be used)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(technology, be used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(technology, be used)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(mobile, be used)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(mobile, be used)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mobile, be used)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(mobile, be used)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(mobile, be used)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mobile, be used in business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(mobile, be used)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mobile, want use)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mobile, be used)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(mobile, be used in business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mobile, be used)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(mobile, want use)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mobile, be used)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mobile, want use)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mobile, be used)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mobile, be used in business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mobile, be used)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(mobile, want use)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mobile, be used)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mobile, be used in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mobile, be used)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mobile, be used)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(mobile, be used)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mobile, be used)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mobile, be used)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(mobile, be used)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(technology, be used)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mobile, be used)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(technology, be used)