mobile: have service

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.70
, technology
Weight: 0.66
, medium
Weight: 0.65
, market
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cellphone
Weight: 0.37
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36
, cellular telephone
Weight: 0.36
, phone
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have service 1.00
have bad service 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(mobile, have service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(mobile, have service)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(mobile, have service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mobile, have bad service)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(mobile, have service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(mobile, have bad service)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(mobile, have service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(mobile, have bad service)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mobile, have service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(mobile, have bad service)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(mobile, have service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mobile, have service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mobile, have service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(mobile, have service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mobile, have service)