mobile: want use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.70
, technology
Weight: 0.66
, medium
Weight: 0.65
, market
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cellphone
Weight: 0.37
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36
, cellular telephone
Weight: 0.36
, phone
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
want use 1.00
need have 0.85
be used 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(technology, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(mobile, want use)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mobile, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(technology, be used)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mobile, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(technology, be used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(technology, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mobile, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mobile, want use)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mobile, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(mobile, want use)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(mobile, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mobile, need have)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mobile, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(mobile, need have)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mobile, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(mobile, need have)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(mobile, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mobile, be used)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mobile, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(mobile, need have)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mobile, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(mobile, be used)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mobile, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(mobile, be used)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mobile, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(mobile, be used)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mobile, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(mobile, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mobile, want use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mobile, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(mobile, want use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mobile, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(technology, be used)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(mobile, want use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(technology, be used)