model: be useful in science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents example
Weight: 0.65
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings honda civic
Weight: 0.66
, bmw
Weight: 0.64
, theory
Weight: 0.63
, platform
Weight: 0.62
, hybrid
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful in science 1.00
be helpful in science 0.95
be useful in earth science 0.94
be important in science 0.93
be beneficial for science 0.92
be used in science 0.91
be useful in biology 0.90
be necessary in science 0.90
be important in earth science 0.86
be helpful in mathematics 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(theory, be used in science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(theory, be used in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(theory, be used in science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(model, be useful in science)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(model, be useful in earth science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(model, be useful in earth science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(model, be helpful in mathematics)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(model, be used in science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(model, be helpful in mathematics)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(model, be used in science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(model, be helpful in science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(model, be useful in earth science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(model, be helpful in science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(model, be important in earth science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(model, be used in science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(model, be used in science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(model, be important in earth science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(model, be used in science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(model, be used in science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(model, be helpful in mathematics)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(model, be necessary in science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(model, be useful in earth science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(model, be used in science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(model, be used in science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(model, be necessary in science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(model, be important in earth science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(model, be necessary in science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(model, be helpful in science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(model, be necessary in science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(model, be helpful in mathematics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(model, be helpful in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(model, be important in earth science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(model, be useful in science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(model, be useful in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(model, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(theory, be used in science)